What happened to KUEN? I live in St. George, across from Webb Hill, and watch TV over the air. I have scanned my TV, but channel 9 KUEN has disappeared. It has not aired in almost 1 week. Is this a problem that will be resolved, or have I lost this station forever? Janie G****n
Your Feedback
CPB seeks to make public broadcasting more accessible to the public it serves. To do so CPB maintains a toll-free, 24-hour telephone line (1-800-272-2190), an online contact form, and accepts letters sent directly to CPB.
All comments are available on this website to be viewed by the general public. Each year, by statute, CPB transmits this public link to the White House for its report to Congress. Additionally, comments pertaining to programming are shared with the CPB Board of Directors and relevant public media staff.
Search:
KUEN BROADCASTS
Bias
Very very sad what CPB has become very leftist and no regard’s to conservative folks that are not leftist.
Pbs newshour audio
The audio for PBS Newshour is poor. The frequency range is similar to the narrow smothered sound of A.M radio. Why not EQ and improve the sound quality?
Excluding a Recognized Candidate in a PBS Forum
Hello.
It is unfortunate that I am forced to write this correspondence today because I usually tell anyone who would listen to me that, PBS literally changed my life as a child.
However, being that I am legally on the ballot and also a publicly touted candidate for the Illinois Secretary of State, and was excluded from the WTTW Chicago candidate forum last week, has changed my life and not in the way it did when I was younger.
WTTW Chicago television station is partially funded by government monies and also from public funds, from honorable people like myself. Your Producers, picking and choosing which candidates will appear on a forum and which ones won't is not in the spirit of being a "open, transparent company" that is supposed to serve the public interest. Clearly, last nights candidate forum you served no one except the two party system.
I have contacted my attorney and we are now in the process pf exploring any legal options we have in response to your stations purposeful oversight.
I hope you and WTTW responds to this email in a way that satisfies my party, the public at large and convinces me to drop legal action.
Respectfully submitted,
Jon Stewart Libertarian Candidate for the Illinois Secretary of State
Cc: IL Libertarian Party, Matteo Rago, Esquire
Finding your roots
Don’t white and Spanish peoples have any roots?
Can’t get it on channel 28
Ion is all I get I am in Glendale Ca.
Health care had kept me from getting proe deper treatment for systemic blackwidow bite for 11 years
But, paralyzed. Didn't know what it was neither did doctors. I had good insurance, husband left me in poor living conditions. I have develop fungal, bacterial, parasitic and let alone the toxicitu from spider. No treatment can work because of the many poisons in me. Ss messed up on me, been trying for 11years to get disability, on Medicaid. No one will help me. They said I had Medicare and turned around and said I didn't. I am 64 now and still can't get the help I need. I pray I can receive it asap.
CONCERN: News about the science, politics, and legal proceedings related to wireless radiation safety are not being shared
Submitted 10/16/22: I've been watching the science on electromagnetic fields, specifically power frequencies and wireless transmission frequencies, for 22 years. Despite the fact that there were already concerns expressed by the EPA iby 1980 regarding the carcinogenicity of RF and the adequacy of the FCC exposure limits (before EPA studies were defunded), and already by the 1970s the Navy had compiled over a thousand studies showing biological effects at low intensity levels, and already a great majority of the modern studies are showing biological effects of EMF at levels that are not supposed to be biologically active according to the now out-dated thermal paradigm (which itself was based on animal behavior studies and "hunches" back in the last century), and despite the fact that the NIEHS/National Toxicology Program found "clear evidence of carcinogenicity" at non-thermal levels of RF, backed up by the Ramazzini Institute's similar studies at even lower intensity levels---PBS and NPR seem to be uninterested in investigating and sharing findings -- not industry PR -- with the public. No major insurers or reinsurers will cover liability for the wireless industry should the emissions from their wireless devices and infrastructure cause health harm to users--why? because they have looked at the evidence and they don't want to lose their shirts on another tobacco debacle. Last year a federal judge in Environmental Health Trust v. FCC ruled that current exposure limits are not based on a full review of the current science----that in fact, no federal agency has conducted such a full review, although they all give semi-reassurances of safety on their public information websites. The wireless industry---which funds much of public broadcasting--tells the FCC what to do, and they help place their own people as director and commissioners. They get laws passed in Congress that take away the rights of citizens and municipalities to have any say in where telecom infrastructure goes, what is used and how. They get waivers from FCC to test body SAR on cell phones a slight distance away from the test "body," (a gel filled receptacle) which then registers a much lower SAR than would be experienced by someone carrying a cell phone in their pocket. Brain cancer lawsuits filed in 2001 are only coming to a hearing now in 2022 because of convenient delays perpetrated by the industry. There is so much wrong in the telecom realm, but public broadcasting is not covering any of it---and you have an investigative team for Frontline that could provide the perfect venue with experienced investigative reporters, but year after year, Nothing. As the lawyers say, there is no smoking gun to seek out----all the information is readily available and out there, you just have to put the dots together, and know which "experts," committees and commissions are actually associated with the industry, and not independent of its influence.
This situation has made me very cynical about the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, PBS, NPR, etc. You have every man, woman, and child --all your constituents--exposed to this in nearly every environment they sleep, live, work, grow, and study in. All ages, including pre-birth. They trust that if Public Broadcasting doesn't say there's a problem, then everything's all right. Well, it isn't all right, for people, or for flora and fauna, but you have to be willing to put the present and future well-being of your constituency first, and hold a shady industry accountable for its continued obfuscation of the facts.
I speak from my own experience on committees with the telecoms, and years of communications with scientists. There is a problem. Go there!
EPA history: https://ehtrust.org/epa-recommendations-and-reports-on-cell-phones-radiofrequency-and-electromagnetic-fields/ Navy history: https://zoryglaser.com/ Bioeffects science today: https://bioinitiative.org/ (see H. Lai research summaries) and https://www.saferemr.com/ (J. Moskowitz monthly science updates) History of thermal paradigm: http://www.iemfa.org/wp-content/pdf/RF%20history.pdf References N. Steneck's 1984 book, "The Microwave Debate" NTP report: https://www.saferemr.com/2018/11/NTP-final-reports31.html J. Moskowitz (UC/Berkeley) discusses the studies (with reference links) Insurance liability: https://www.jrseco.com/lloyds-insurance-company-does-not-cover-health-damage-caused-by-electromagnetic-radiation/ Federal judge ruling: https://ehtrust.org/in-historic-decision-federal-court-finds-fcc-failed-to-explain-why-it-ignored-scientific-evidence-showing-harm-from-wireless-radiation/ FCC+Industry: https://ethics.harvard.edu/files/center-for-ethics/files/capturedagency_alster.pdf Flora/Fauna impacts: https://www.microwavenews.com/short-takes-archive/review-emf-and-rf-effects-flora-and-fauna
Margaret M. Glaser Chicago, IL
Corporation for Propaganda Broadcasting is more accurate
You should call yourselves the Corporation for Propaganda Broadcasting. Could your programming get any more unscrientic misleading and leftist?
You are a national disgrace. De-fund the police? De-fund fake organizations like you. Wouldn't be surprised if the whole board of directors is taking payola directly from the CPP on top of the federal government to spread state sponsored narratives and propaganda. You are traitors to the United States of America and the US Constitution.
Pinkalicious "The New Girl"
America and the Holocat
WW2 Obsession for Fundraising
Linda Carducci
Bias
Fresno California
About Your Shows
Dear The Corporation For The Public Broadcasting,
I like your shows and your web sites. Hope you're doing well.
Sincerely, Harrison
New Member to C.P.B.
My name is G.L. M******s. I am the Founder Emeritus Of "Universal Project for Human Development Incorporated" and author of the book based on the Project entitled, "From the Ghettoes to the Promised Land". Due to the materials and concepts, I introduce everywhere I go, I feel it important to sign in with the media for coverage of my activities. Such activities as the introduction of a "Roxbury Stock Exchange Plaza", here in Roxbury, Massachusetts. I am grateful for the opportunity to share with the nation, what I feel will help black America remember the parting words of the late, great Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. We as a people will get to the Promised Land in these United States of America.
We are blocked from PASSPORT
We are standing members of CPTV, or CPB, whichever is appropriate. But we have been blocked from PASSPORT shows for a couple of weeks or more. You are still deducting money from our account, so that is the same. Could you please check this out and fix the problem? Thank you very much. Robert and Judith Jerome
frontline--lies, politics, and decmocracy
As I watched this frontline episode, I have no doubt that everything in the episode is true. Our nation is truly under siege by politicians in both parties. Trouble is when the media decides to take side too! While being true, this episode is so distorted to one side(of course left) that many years from now, people will view this episode and think just how terrible Trump and the Republicans were. What they won't be able to know is that the right AN!D the left were disgusting! Tell the truth! This is PBS, our country deserves dedicated programming that has not been butchered by media bias. I have no problem with the reporting of what Trump did--but what about the Democrats? What did they do? And how was the media complicit in shaping the narrative just like this episode? Just terrible bias--and am NO Trump supporter
FRONTLINE: Lies, Politics and Democracy
This "documentary" was nothing short of a campaign contribution to the Democratic nominee in the 2024 Presidential election. There were SO MANY untruths about President Trump--things that have already been proven to be false, yet you continue the narrative. Not only was Trump portrayed in the worst possible light, but NONE of his accomplishments were even mentioned. DID YOU CONSULT WITH A SINGLE REPUBLICAN BEFORE YOU PUT OUT SUCH CATEGORICALLY FALSE PROPOGANDA?? OBVIOUSLY this was a hit-job by the Democrat party in an ALL-OUT EFFORT to sway the 2024 Presidential election and you happily obliged to participate. It's absolutely despicable. PBS lacks ANY sort of objectivity whatsoever. I will be contacting my elected representatives in order to STOP MY TAX DOLLARS from funding your channel.